http://www.eff.org/pub/Privacy/ITAR_export/Crypto_bills_1996/
Last Updated Thu Mar 13 10:42:49 PDT 2003
For 1997 information on the Bernstein case and other litigation
against crypto export controls, see each case's archive under
http://www.eff.org/pub/Legal/Cases
Files in this Archive
- 960724_isoc_crypto.statement
- Statement on cryptographic technology and
the Internet, from Internet Architecture Board and Internet Engineering
Steering Group of the Internet Society (ISOC). Excerpt: "The IAB and
IESG are...disturbed to note that various governments have actual or
proposed policies on access to cryptographic technology that either:
(a) impose restrictions by implementing export controls; and/or
(b) restrict commercial and private users to weak and inadequate
mechanisms such as short cryptographic keys; and/or
(c) mandate that private decryption keys should be in the hands of
the government or of some other third party; and/or
(d) prohibit the use of cryptology entirely, or permit it only
to specially authorized organizations."
- 960520_burns_clipper_III.announce
- Sen. Burns (sponsor of the Pro-CODE
crypto export deregulation bill) announces opposition to Clipper III,
and criticizes Administration export policy.
- hr3011_96.bill
- 1996 version of Rep. Goodlatte's pro-encryption
legislation, "The Security and Freedom through Encryption Act" (SAFE).
Did not pass.
- hr659_97_introduced.bill
- 1997 version of Rep. Goodlatte's formerly
pro-encryption legislation, "The Security and Freedom through
Encryption Act" (SAFE), as introduced. NOTE: As of Sept. 1997, the bill
was "amended" by replacing all of it with a Big Brother anti-encryption
bill.
- hr659_97_natsec_anticrypto.amendment
- Amendment to HR659 (the "SAFE"
formerly pro-crypto bill) in which Reps. Weldon and Dellums gut the
bill's liberalization of export controls on encryption, and give the
Dept. of Defense new authority to deny export licenses. Sept. 1997.
- hr659_97_intell_anticrypto.amendment
- Amendment to HR659 (the "SAFE"
formerly pro-crypto bill already weakened by the House National
Security Cmte.), in which Reps. Goss and Dicks strip the bill of
everything good that it would have done, and replace it with
Orwellian provisions for increased export controls, new import
controls, and mandatory key surrender. Be afraid. Be very afraid.
Sept. 1997.
- hr_crypto_960515.letter
- Letter from Rep. Goodlatte (and over 20 other
Representatives) to Clinton Administration urging relaxation of crypto
export controls and abandonment of Clipper III "key escrow" proposals.
Also includes Goodlatte press release regarding the letter.
- hr_crypto_960515_letter_eff.statement
- Brief EFF statement on the House
letter to Clinton demanding abandonment of "key escrow" and urging
relaxation of export controls. (Also includes a copy of the letter).
- s1726_96.bill
- Sen. Burns' May 2, 1996, encryption export
deregulation bill. As with the ECPA-2 bill, co-sponsored by Leahy.
This bill, known as the Pro-CODE bill, is the most pro-privacy,
pro-commerce, pro-Net bill to day, and essentially supercedes the ECPA-2
and SAFE bills (stronger prohibition against forced key escrow, better
export dereg, and does not create a new crime.) Need some final tweaking,
but all in all a very solid piece of privacy legislation.
- eff_procode_ipc_goldkey_960502.announce
- EFF statement on S.1726, the
Burns-sponsored Pro-CODE crypto deregulation bill, on the advent of
the Golden Key encryption freedom campaign, and on the formation of
the Internet Privacy Coalition.
- s1726_burns_960328.announce
- Sen. Burns' press release regarding his new
encryption export deregulation bill.
- s1587_96.bill
- Sen. Leahy's on a roll: Leahy and others introduced this new
bill to partially deregulate encryption export, Mar. 5 96. - a promising
move that is sure to raise the level of Congressional awareness of
increasingly vital online security, privacy and commercial needs.
Such a bill could also nail the coffin shut on hare-brained
Administration schemes like "key escrow" (copies of all users' encryption
keys held for the convenience of law enforcement.) Problems remain in
the legislation, including unclear language in some areas, and the
creation of a new felony of using encryption to thwart police
investigation of a felony - tatamount to making it an extra crime to
close the curtains when breaking the law. EFF is largely supportive
of most of the provisions of the legislation. The bill also creates
a legal infrastructure for key escrow, though it does aim to prevent
the imposition of such a system. The House version, H.R. 3011, is
considerably stronger in this regard.
- s1587_96_epic.analysis
- Electronic Privacy Info. Center's analysis of
the ECPA-2 bill.
- eff_s1587_030596.statement
- EFF's largely positive statement regarding
Sen. Leahy's new "Encrypted Communications Privacy Act". Some problems
remain with the legislation, and it would be simpler and better for
the industry and the public to deregulate rather than shift regulations,
but the legislation is a major step forward and is certain to raise
awareness in Congress of vital issues like digital commerce, Internet
security, and online privacy.
- leahy_pgp_960502_net.letter
- Sen. Leahy's open letter to the Net community,
on PGP, encryption and new privacy legislation. This appears to be the
first time any US Senator has publicly used the PGP encryption program.
- leahy_s1587_95_intro.statement
- Sen. Leahy's introduction to his new
[largely] pro-privacy, pro-encryption bill to reduced export
restrictions on encryption. The bill, S. 1587, was introduced Mar. 5,
1996.
- s1726_960513.alert
- ACTION ALERT: Support new pro-privacy bill, the
Promotion of Commerce Online in the Digital Era (Pro-CODE) bill, S. 1726.
(May 13, 1996)
- senate_s1587_96.summary
- Senate staffers' summary of Sen. Leahy's new
Encrypted Commmunications Privacy Act, introduced Mar. 5, 1996.
- hr3011_96.bill
- Rep. Goodlatte's "Security And Freedom through Encryption
(SAFE) Act", a pro-crypto, pro-privacy, pro-Net bill largely mirroring
Sen. Leahy's efforts in S. 1587, but with stronger protections against
imposition of key 'escrow' systems. Like Leahy's bill, this
legislation (introduced Mar. 5 1996) creates a new, but fairly narrow
felony of cryptographical obstructing justice in furtherance of a felony.
Subdirectories in This Archive
- Up to the Parent Directory
- [no subdirectories]
Related On-Site Resources
-
Clipper III link to directory of info on
- Clinton Administration's "Clipper III" crypto key "escrow" scheme
(the government opposition to Pro-CODE and to other attempts to
deregulate crypto export.)
- Export Restrictions
- Link to Archive of info on US export restrictions on
encryption (the ITAR or International Traffic in Arms Regulations, and
the Export Control Act).
-
Key Escrow
- Link to Archive of info on government key "escrow"
proposals, in which everyone's encryption keys are held by government
agencies or other third parties for the convenience of law enforcement
and spy agencies.
Links to Related Off-Site Resources
- Encryption Policy Resource
Center
- Joint project of CDT, VTW and EFF
- The
Congressional Internet Caucus
- A new group of US legislators trying to protect the Internet
webmaster@eff.org