<?php

include("eff_setup2.php");

$smarty = new EFFSmarty;

$smarty->assign('title','Letter to Governor Pataki');

// if breadcrumb == true, then it fill in the right trail in the issue
// array
$smarty->assign('breadcrumb','false');

// example:
//$issue = array("Issues" => "/issues/", "Privacy" => "/issues/privacy/", "TIA" => "/issues/privacy/tia/");

$smarty->assign('issue',$issue);

$content  = '
<div id="featuretext">

<p>
March 12, 2003<br />
The Honorable George E. Pataki<br />
State Capitol<br />
Albany, NY 12224
</p>

<p>
Dear Governor Pataki:
</p>

<p>
The Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) and the Electronic Frontier
Foundation (EFF), public interest organizations that seeks to promote civil
liberties in the information age, write to express grave concerns about S. 1627, a
bill that recently passed the New York Senate. In our view, S. 1627 so broadly
defines the crime of "cyberterrorism" that even the most low-level, non-violent
computer crime would become a serious felony if the bill were enacted into law.
While we commend the State of New York for attempting to address the threat
of cyberterrorism, we urge that this provision not be enacted as drafted, and that
careful consideration be given to any future cyberterrorism legislation to ensure
that political protesters are not treated as terrorists.
</p>

<p>
As drafted, S. 1627 would severely penalize petty crimes of a political nature,
including online civil disobedience. S. 1627 makes any computer crime or "denial
of service attack" a "cyberterrorism" crime (and therefore a serious felony) if
committed "with the intent to .!.!. influence the policy of a unit of government by
intimidation or coercion, or affect the conduct of a unit of government." If the
goal of the legislation is to penalize more harshly the most serious computer
attacks that cause physical harm or damage critical infrastructures, the provision
is too broadly drafted to further that goal. As written, the legislation sweeps
within the definition of "cyberterrorism" minor, politically motivated computer
crimes. While prosecution of these petty crimes under current law is justified,
there is no reason to treat the perpetrators of these non-violent crimes as
terrorists.
</p>

<p>
For example, S. 1627 would treat as terrorist acts many "web defacements,"
where a website is entered without authorization and content is added, removed
or replaced (but no permanent damage is done to the site). Web defacement,
while justly illegal, is a non-violent civil disobedience tactic that often is intended
precisely to "affect the conduct of a unit of government" - and would therefore
become a terrorist felony if S. 1627 were enacted. (Under current law, the crime
of web defacement is a class A misdemeanor.) In this respect, S. 1627 also raises
serious constitutional concerns, as it would more severely punish politically
motivated web defacements than those done for non-political reasons.
</p>

<p>
S. 1627 also would define as cyberterrorism a politically motivated "denial of
service attack," which is currently not a state crime at all. A denial of service
attack occurs when a network server is inundated with too much information for
it to handle - either by email traffic or website hits - so that legitimate users
cannot access the server. Like web defacements, denial of service attacks are
commonly used as a form of civil disobedience - a kind of cyber "sit-in." Even a
campaign that encourages citizens to send email to their elected officials could be
characterized as a denial of service attack if it results in a large volume of email.
It is nonsensical and likely unconstitutional to punish these attacks when made
with an intent to "affect the conduct of a unit of government," yet not punish
them at all when done for non-political reasons.
</p>

<p>
This bill is not effective cyberterrorism legislation. It does not distinguish
between those engaging in petty crimes, and those whose aims are to seriously
damage a computer network in order to cause physical harm to civilians, severe
economic hardship, or the crippling of critical infrastructures. CDT and EFF
believe that these complex issues deserve careful review and public hearings
before legislation is enacted. We encourage the State of New York to combat
cyberterrorism, but not to brand as "terrorists" those who commit minor illegal
acts in cyberspace, just as those who commit civil disobedience offline are not
punished as terrorists.
</p>

<p>
Sincerely,
</p>

<p>
Center for Democracy and Technology<br />
1634 I Street NW, Suite 1100<br />
Washington, DC 20006<br />
www.cdt.org
</p>

<p>
Electronic Frontier Foundation<br />
454 Shotwell Street<br />
San Francisco, CA 94110<br />
www.eff.org
</p>
<p>

cc: Senate Majority Leader Joseph L. Bruno<br />
Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver

</p>
</div>
';

global $REQUEST_URI;
$smarty->assign('content',$content);
$smarty->display('generic.tpl',$REQUEST_URI);

?>
