-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=-=-=-=Copyright 1993,4 Wired Ventures, Ltd.  All Rights Reserved-=-=-=-=
-=-=For complete copyright information, please see the end of this file=-=-
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

WIRED 1.6
Negroponte
**********

Virtual Reality: Oxymoron or Pleonasm?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I never knew the meaning of "pleonasm" until I recently listened to a
lecture by Mike Hammer (not the detective, but the world's leading
"re-engineer"). In his typically animated fashion, Hammer presented
"corporate change" as an oxymoron on its way to becoming a pleonasm.
Basically, a pleonasm is a redundant expression like "in one's own mind."
It is the opposite of an oxymoron, which is an apparent contradiction like
"artificial intelligence" or "airplane food." If prizes were awarded for
the best oxymorons, "virtual reality" would certainly be a winner.
Freshman physics teaches us about real versus virtual images. Classicists
get a more complex dose of the same in their reading of Plato. But virtual
reality - or VR - is becoming a pleonasm.

If the words "virtual reality" are seen not as noun and adjective but as
"equal halves," the logic of calling VR a pleonasm is more palatable.
Basically, VR makes the artificial as realistic as the real. In flight
simulation, its most sophisticated and longest-standing application, VR is
more realistic than the real. Pilots are able to take the controls of
fully loaded passenger planes for their first flight because they have
learned more in the simulator than they could in a real plane. In the
simulator, a pilot can be subjected to rare situations that, in the real
world, would require more than a near miss.

I have often thought that one of the most socially responsible
applications of VR would be its required use in driving schools. Virtual
reality can place drivers in perilous predicaments - on a slippery road, a
child darts out from between two cars - that they may encounter in their
cars. All of us hope we are never faced with such situations, and none of
us knows how we might react. VR allows one to experience a situation "with
one's own eyes" (another pleonasm). As the French journalist Rene Doutard
wrote, "Courage is having done it before."


VR Then and Now

Neophytes have a mistaken sense that VR is very new because the press just
learned about it. It is not. Almost 25 years ago, Ivan Sutherland
developed, with support from ARPA, the first surprisingly advanced VR
system. This may not be astonishing to old-timers, because Ivan seems to
have had half the good ideas in computer science. However, Ivan's idea is
now very affordable. One company, whose name I am obliged to omit, will
soon introduce a VR display system with a parts cost of less than US$25.

The dress code for VR is a head-tracking helmet with goggle displays. The
principle is simple: Put data where the person is looking and nowhere
else. In donning such a display, the general locale of your gaze is a
given and elementary optics can move an image from the tip of your nose to
infinity.

For a computer-graphics jock, the measures of reality are the numbers of
polygons and/or edges a given image has, and the ability to apply textures
to those images (considered cheating by some). Should you ask yourself,
"What is the optimum number of edges and display resolution needed for
photo-realistic imaging?" the answer is probably near you as you read
this. Look out a window and imagine that window is a display.

The argument will be made that head-mounted displays are not acceptable
because people feel silly wearing them. The same was once said about
stereo headphones. If Sony's Akio Morita had not insisted on marketing the
damn things, we might not have the Walkman today. I expect that within the
next five years more than one in ten people will wear head-mounted
computer displays while traveling in buses, trains, and planes. That
number could include pilots -who could be landing planes in low visibility
wearing goggles that subtract the real fog.

By the way, don't believe for a moment that all of our perceptions are
derived from what we see. One of the most frequently cited studies
conducted at the Media Lab was authored by Professor Russ Neuman, who
proved that people saw a better picture when sound quality was improved.
This observation extends to all of our senses as they work cooperatively.
Some Department of Defense prototypes have shown that minor and random
vibrations of a tank simulator platform induce an uncanny sense of extra
visual realism.


The Couch Commando

The real issue and challenge in VR today is not the display, but how to
reconcile a person's expectations of reality with what current systems
deliver in terms of response time. In fact, all commercial systems,
including those that will soon be brought to you by the major video game
manufacturers, have a terrible lag. As you move your head, the image
before you changes rapidly, but not rapidly enough. Even sophisticated
flight simulators are lacking in this regard.

When you look out that window, you take for granted that the mullions
won't alias and jerk as you move your head from left to right. We grow up
in a world that fosters immediacy in action and reaction. In fact, young
children find it almost impossible to steer a motor boat because its
response time is just too long.

I played with VR systems fifteen or twenty years ago. With head-mounted
glasses that were either piezo-ceramic shutters or polarized lenses, we
could display images in stereo, squirting the proper view into each eye
and thereby giving a sense of depth through binocular parallax. This is
commonplace today.

But what I remember so vividly is that everyone - not most people, but
literally everyone - would, after putting these glasses on for the first
time, immediately move their heads from side to side, looking for the
images before them to reflect their expectations of realistic motion
parallax. Usually the system did not perform.

That human response, the "neck jerk" reaction, says it all. In VR, the
frequency response of the system will be almost all that counts. While I
am not aware of any such studies that would support the claim, I suspect
that rapid response can be traded for resolution. If you look to the right
or the left, you will be very dissatisfied if the landscape moves along
jerkily, with spatial and temporal aliasing, because aliased VR is the
oxymoron while VR itself will be the pleonasm, whether we like the ring of
the words or not.

Next Issue: Aliasing: The Technical Blindspot of the Computer Industry

                                   * * *

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=WIRED Online Copyright Notice=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

        Copyright 1993,4 Wired Ventures, Ltd.  All rights reserved.

  This article may be redistributed provided that the article and this
  notice remain intact. This article may not under any circumstances
  be resold or redistributed for compensation of any kind without prior
  written permission from Wired Ventures, Ltd.

  If you have any questions about these terms, or would like information
  about licensing materials from WIRED Online, please contact us via
  telephone (+1 (415) 904 0660) or email (info@wired.com).

       WIRED and WIRED Online are trademarks of Wired Ventures, Ltd.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=