ELECTRONIC COMMERCE AND THE NII Summary of Comments Committee On Applications and Technology Information Infrastructure Task Force September 8, 1994 Chuck Chamberlain, USPS David K. Jefferson, NIST Comments on the Scope of Electronic Commerce Comments indicated that Electronic Commerce must support other applications. For example, these comments suggest that Electronic Commerce must support the Manufacturing and Government Services applications: "Design and development of products should get more attention in this section (page 26). It is a manufacturing issue as well, but this is a significant opportunity and it is tied to Electronic Commerce and the NII. . . . Many of the technologies required (such as distributed simulations, networked virtual environments, high performance computation, large scale storage management, interactive visualization systems, and virtual reality presentation) are addressed by other sections for different applications but could be coordinated here. . . . Technology . . . could also eliminate proximity as an element of the traditional office working environment for all the application arenas. The notion of a virtual workplace probably deserves more focus." "The Government oversees vast quantities of data that are not readily accessible by the public. An objective of the NII should be to make these data available. Private use of these data using data mining tools, future parallel search engines and other tools could enhance service delivery. . . ." "In the introduction it discusses Business to Business communications. It does not identify that the same basic capability can be applied to link Business to Consumers and the reverse. The same applies to linking government to individual citizens." Comments on Issues Raised in the Report (quotations in bold are from page 39 of the Report) Security/integrity The Report proposed that "Government and industry cannot accept Electronic Commerce unless electronic transactions are secure. There are clear requirements for authentication of the source of a transaction, verification of the integrity of the transaction, prevention of disclosure of the transaction to unauthorized users, and verification of receipt of the transaction by the intended trading partner. . . ." Many comments supported the importance of the issue; some comments mentioned specific solutions, such as "Premenos, a value-added EDI services provider, is now offering in a test mode with several Fortune 500 clients, public key services for securing electronic transactions." Interoperability/scalability The Report proposed that "We must develop technologies, measurement tools, testing services, interoperability demonstrations, etc., to ensure that components satisfy the current and future requirements of government and industry. . . ." Most comments supported the importance of the issue (i.e., interoperability), but did not propose specific programs for achieving that goal. The CALS-ISG, among others, has this as a major thrust of their national and international mission as well as the creation and publishing of business cases. The comments included the following: "How can NII accommodate requirements for reliability, response time, interoperability, and security of EC?" "Need cost-effective security combined with cost-effective interoperability, plus performance matching existing proprietary and/or private networks" "Concerns about interconnectivity and information discovery are being replaced by concerns about interoperability and security" ". . . how can its widespread use be facilitated. We feel that the best way is for the government to be a role model to industry by educating its own managers on the technology and processes, and implementing electronic commerce for its own purposes with as broad a constituency as possible, both within the government and with affinity groups. By doing so, the government, because of its size, and the number of affinity groups with which it works, can provide important seed money required by vendors and businesses to build the infrastructure and transaction volumes necessary to achieve critical mass for this market." Non-technical issues The Report proposed that "Successful resolution of technical issues will be insufficient to ensure the widespread use of Electronic Commerce; economic, cultural, regulatory, and legal barriers to Electronic Commerce must be identified and removed. . . ." The comments expressed general concerns related to problems of providing universal access to Electronic Commerce, and specific concerns about how small business can economically participate in Electronic Commerce. One comment stated that "As the sophistication required to compete increases, the cost to compete will also rise. This could potentially put small businesses with limited investment capital at a disadvantage. Some consideration should be given to the NII impact to the competitive balance in the marketplace. There should be a discussion of potential undesired effects and ways that these can be mitigated without slowing the collective competitiveness of American Industry. One approach might be an expansion of the Electronic Commerce application discussed on page 32 to provide a forum for the use of small business to post its services, qualifications, availability and other relevant information. Such a service could be accessed by other small businesses, prime contractors and the agencies themselves. This could become a forum where small businesses might use the NlI to broker their services." Another comment suggested additional services related to the Government Services application: "Reduced time in accessing government statistics and information such as regulations which assist businesses in decision making and manufacturing. Ability of small businesses or companies in accessing and transferring data which is currently limited to well funded corporations." Important questions raised in the comments included the following: "How will EC affect small business?" "How will small business input their EC requirements into the builders of the NII?" "How will use of the NII for EC affect urban and regional development? Do urban and regional planners discuss EC requirements with small business and builders of the NII?" "How will EC in the NII coordinate requirements and progress with EC in the GII?" .