<?php

include("eff_setup2.php");

$smarty = new EFFSmarty;

$smarty->assign('title','California Supreme Court Upholds Free Speech in DVD Case');

// if breadcrumb == true, then it fill in the right trail in the issue
// array
$smarty->assign('breadcrumb','false');

// example:
//$issue = array("Issues" => "/issues/", "Privacy" => "/issues/privacy/", "TIA" => "/issues/privacy/tia/");

//Creative Commons - If you need to turn OFF the CC license, set cc = false
//$smarty->assign('cc',"false");

$smarty->assign('issue',$issue);

$content  = '
<div id="featuretext">



<h4>For Immediate Release: Monday, August 25, 2003</h4>

<h1>California Supreme Court Upholds Free Speech in DVD Case</h1>

<h2>Sets High Standard for Publishing DVD Decoding Information</h2>
<h4>Electronic Frontier Foundation Media Release</h4>
<br />
<p>
San Francisco - The California Supreme Court ruled today
that publication of information regarding the decoding of
DVDs merits a strong level of protection as free speech
and sent a key case back to a lower court for a decision
on whether a court can prevent Andrew Bunner from
publishing this information, whether on the Internet, on
a T-shirt, or elsewhere.
</p>

<p>
In the case, DVD Copy Control Association (DVD-CCA) v.
Bunner, California resident Andrew Bunner was one of
thousands of people worldwide who republished DVD-decryption
software called DeCSS. DVD-CCA, the company that licenses
the use of the DVD encryption code, convinced a trial court
to issue an order barring publication of DeCSS pending a
final decision in the case, claiming that DeCSS contained
its trade secrets. The Court of Appeal ruled that the ban
on publication was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court
today required the Court of Appeal to reexamine the
evidence.
</p>

<p>
"The appeals court can now examine the movie industry\'s
fiction that DeCSS is still a secret and that a publication
ban is necessary to keep the information secret," said
Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Legal Director Cindy
Cohn. "DeCSS is obviously not a trade secret since it\'s
available on thousands of websites, T-shirts, neckties,
and other media worldwide." EFF serves as co-counsel on the
case.
</p>

<p>
In issuing its ruling, the California Supreme Court found
that publication of the DeCSS code is an activity that
requires the court to apply strong First Amendment
principles. DVD-CCA had claimed originally that the courts
need not consider any First Amendment issues.
</p>

<p>
"We are heartened that the court acknowledged that trade
secret injunctions must be subject to a high level of First
Amendment scrutiny," said David Greene, Executive
Director of the First Amendment Project who argued the
case on behalf of Bunner. "We are confident that, having
looked at the facts, the Court of Appeal will remove the
restriction on Bunner\'s right to republish publicly
available information.
</p>

<p>
DVD-CCA is a consortium of the major motion picture studios
and major consumer electronics manufacturers that licenses
DVD encryption technology. DVD-CCA originally filed suit in
December 1999, three months after the DeCSS code became
available on the Internet.
</p>

<p>
DVD-CCA obtained the preliminary anti-publication order
shortly thereafter. DVD-CCA named hundreds of people in the
lawsuit, including those who printed DeCSS on T-shirts.
DVD-CCA contends that those who republish DeCSS improperly
disclose its trade secrets, despite the fact that those
people didn\'t create the DeCSS software which is widely
available on the Internet.
</p>

<p>
DVD-CCA doesn\'t claim that Bunner created DeCSS or stole any
trade secrets. Instead, DVD-CCA is attempting to stretch
trade secret law to include Bunner, a member of the public
who had no inside information or contractual arrangement
with DVD-CCA, but who instead found the program on a public
website and decided to republish it.
</p>

<p>
Bunner is a defendant in one of several lawsuits the
entertainment industry has launched since the publication of
DeCSS to mixed results.
</p>

<p>
Another branch of the case, DVD-CCA v. Pavlovich, ended this
spring when the U.S. Supreme Court decided not to rule in
favor of DVD-CCA after the California Supreme Court decided
that it was improper to force Matthew Pavlovich, another
alleged republisher of DeCSS, to come to California to
defend the trade secret claim.
</p>

<p>
In other DeCSS-related litigation, the original publisher of
the program, Norwegian teenager Jon Johansen, was acquitted
of all criminal charges. The Norwegian government has
appealed that decision, and the case is currently scheduled
for re-trial in December 2003.
</p>

<p>
In another case, a coalition of movie studios prevented
further publication of DeCSS by 2600 Magazine using the
federal anti-circumvention provisions of the Digital
Millennium Copyright Act.
</p>


<h3>Links:</h3>
<ul>
	<li><a href="http://www.eff.org/IP/Video/DVDCCA_case/20030825_bunner_decision.php">California Supreme Court decision in DVD-CCA v. Bunner</a></li>


	<li><a href="http://www.eff.org/IP/Video/DVDCCA_case/">DVD-CCA v. Bunner and Pavlovich case archive</a></li>


	<li><a href="http://www.eff.org/sc/20011101_bunner_appellate_decision.html">6th Appellate Court decision overturning Bunner injunction</a></li>


	<li><a href="http://www.eff.org/IP/Video/DeCSS_prosecutions/Johansen_DeCSS_case/">Jon Johansen case archive</a></li>


	<li><a href="http://www.eff.org/IP/Video/MPAA_DVD_cases/">2600 Case archive</a></li>


	<li><a href="http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~pam/papers/TS%201st%20A%203d%20dr.pdf">EFF Board member and Boalt Hall School of Law Professor Pam Samuelson\'s new paper on trade secrets and the First Amendment</a></li>

</ul>


<h3>Contact:</h3>

<p>
Cindy Cohn<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;Legal Director<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;Electronic Frontier Foundation<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="mailto:cindy@eff.org">cindy@eff.org</a><br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;+1 415 436-9333 x108 (office)
</p>

<p>
David Greene<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;Executive Director and Staff Counsel<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;First Amendment Project<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="mailto:dgreene@thefirstamendment.org">dgreene@thefirstamendment.org</a><br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;+1 510 208-7744
</p>

<h3>About EFF:</h3>

<p>
The Electronic Frontier Foundation is the leading civil
liberties organization working to protect rights in the
digital world. Founded in 1990, EFF actively encourages and
challenges industry and government to support free
expression and privacy online. EFF is a member-supported
organization and maintains one of the most linked-to
websites in the world at
http://www.eff.org/

</p>

</div>
';

global $REQUEST_URI;
$smarty->assign('content',$content);
$smarty->display('generic.tpl',$REQUEST_URI);

?>
