EFF Home Page Alerts Topic Index

EFF "Legal Cases - American Reporter v. Dept. of Justice (Shea v. Reno)" Archive

http://www.eff.org/pub/Legal/Cases/Am_Reporter_v_DoJ/
Last Updated Thu Mar 13 10:41:36 PDT 2003

Files Subdirectories On-Site Links Off-Site Links




Files in this Archive

19961206_cda_supct_acceptance.announce
News release - Supreme Court announces it will hear the appeal of ACLU v. Reno (the Philadelphia anti-CDA constitutional challenge). While this does not indicate any predisposition of the Court to rule one way or the other, it is a good sign. Many cases challenging indecency regulation in broadcasting have met with the Supreme Court declining to hear the cases.
960729.decision
Three-judge panel's ruling agreeing with the American Reporter's arguments in general (they didn't hold the CDA was void for vagueness) and granting a preliminary injunction against the CDA.
020896.article
Article published by the American Reporter in early February that contained possibly "patently offensive" speech.
960608_taylor_amicus.brief
Bruce Taylor/American Family Assoc./Enough is Enough's amicus curiae brief. Taylor inanely tries to convince the court that hacking "finger" (an old Unix net tool supported by few sites any longer) to transmit age information on each user will allow everyone to comply with the CDA. Taylor admits to only having known that finger existed for a few weeks, elsewhere, yet writes as if an expert on the subject. What Taylor apparently does not know is that finger is disabled, for good reason, on most systems, and more importantly that following his idea would allow the pedophiles Taylor is so up in arms about to have the pefect means to figure out who among the online service users are children, and "stalk" them on the net - precisely the opposite result that AFA and EiE could possibly want. If this is the best Taylor can do, those concerned about the CDA's net censorship shouldn't have much to worry about this time around.
amrep_020896.complaint
Complaint (charges) filed against Dept. of Justice, challenging the constitutionality of the Communications Decency Act.
amrep_021696_tro.statement
_American_Reporter_ comment on the issuance of the TRO in the ACLU/EFF/et al. v. DoJ case. Somewhat caustic, as AR does not appear to be protected by the TRO. AR has filed a separate lawsuit challenging the CDA.



Subdirectories in This Archive

Up to the Parent Directory
[no subdirectories]



Related On-Site Resources

EFF "CRLP v. Dept. of Justice (Sanger v. Reno)" Archive
EFF "EFF, ACLU, et al. v. Dept. of Justice (ACLU v. Reno)" Archive
EFF "Internet Censorship Legislation" Archive



Links to Related Off-Site Resources

American Reporter's web site
ACLU WWW Site
EPIC's archive on the legal challenges to the CDA



webmaster@eff.org