http://www.pcworld.com/software/internet_www/articles/oct96/1410_clipper.html PC World Online October 1996 RETURN OF CLIPPER: WITH A VENGEANCE by Declan McCullagh (declan@well.com) The original Clipper Chip met an ignoble death at the hands of privacy advocates, conservatives, and businesses, but the latest proposal is Clipper with a twist: a divide-and-conquer strategy designed to splinter an industry previously united in opposition. Vice President Gore said yesterday the administration temporarily would relax rules on exporting data-scrambling software for those businesses that promise to follow a set of complex new rules giving the government access to the keys used to encode communications. This is a clever move by the Justice Department and the White House. It presents Silicon Valley companies with a kind of unholy prisoner's dilemma -- if you don't buy into this system, your competitor will. Faced with the prospect of hanging together or hanging separately, IBM and Digital Equipment Corporation already have signed onto the plan. Small companies without the money to set up the kind of "key recovery" plan the government demands will be left out, says Alan Davidson from the Center for Democracy and Technology. He says that "this proposal is targeted at large companies that have the resources" to comply with the hefty paperwork. Another problem with this plan is that the strongest encryption software that can be exported uses the 56-bit data encryption standard (DES) algorithm. According to a report released in January 1996 by a working group of renowned cryptographers, DES is woefully inadequate. They say: "To provide adequate protection against the most serious threats -- well-funded commercial enterprises or government intelligence agencies -- keys used to protect data today should be at least 75 bits long." Since the Feds, foreign governments, and determined attackers can break anything encrypted with 56-bit DES, the White House's new Clipper plan will not protect but harm netizens by providing them with a false sense of security. __________________________________________________________ I recently chatted with Michael Vatis, one of the assistant deputy attorneys general who oversees national security issues. He said an international consensus is forming that terrorists can use crypto, therefore crypto must be controlled. "But it just takes one country to decide to export strong crypto," I said. "You're missing something," said Vatis. "What?" I asked. "Unless you're talking about import restrictions." "Exactly," he said. __________________________________________________________ By Declan McCullagh (declan@well.com) Washington, DC-based McCullagh writes about cyber-rights issues. You can subscribe to his Fight-Censorship newsletter on EFF's site. (http://www.eff.org/~declan/fight-censorship/) ###