From: ARTISTpres@aol.com Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 08:37:41 -0500 Subject: Parks Dept. to sell free speech rights Parks Department To Sell Freedom of Speech to the Highest Bidder The Parks Department has decided there's a lot of money to be made by selling concessions in N.Y.C. parks. Unfortunately, it's not just more hot dog carts and ice cream stands that they're interested in selling concessions for. According to an article and letters recently printed in the N.Y. Times the right to display or sell original art in N.Y.C. parks will now become an exclusive right offered solely to the highest bidder. Anyone unsuccessful at bidding for one of the 8 proposed concessions to be designated for artists in front of the Metropolitan Museum of Art or at a limited number of other locations, who attempts to display or sell original fine art of their own creation, will be subject to immediate arrest, confiscation of their art, a $1,000 fine and imprisonment. Previously, the Parks Department's policy was, "We respect artists' First Amendment rights." The Department's Legal Counsel now claims, "Selling art is not protected by the First Amendment". While concession rights to sell hot dogs and pretzels have sold for as high as $275,000 for one spot, hot dog selling is not a guaranteed First Amendment right. Freedom of speech is. "...artistic expression constitutes speech for First Amendment purposes...". Serra v. United States Gen. Servs. Admin., 847 F.2d 1045, 1048 (2d Cir.1988) Selling the tangible form of a medium of speech does not remove its First Amendment protection. When an artist paints, sculpts, draws or creates a photograph and then displays or offers it for sale, they are distributing their visual ideas to the public. This is exactly what an author or public speaker does when distributing their written or verbal ideas by selling a book or accepting a donation for giving a speech. "Speech is protected even though it is a form that is sold for profit, and even though it may involve a solicitation to purchase or otherwise pay or contribute money." Virginia State Bd. of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, 425 U.S. 748, 761 (1976) Public parks are among the locations where freedom of speech is most protected... "The privilege of a citizen of the United States to use the streets and parks for communication...must not, in the guise of regulation, be abridged or denied." Hague v. C.I.O., 307 U.S. 496 (1939) Selling the right of speech to the highest bidder violates the First Amendment's prohibition against "abridging the freedom of speech", and the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of "equal protection under the law" . The Fourteenth Amendment also protects the right to use public lands, such as the City's parks. The artists who have traditionally displayed and sold their art in parks and on the streets of New York City have great respect and affection for our system of parks. We have done nothing to harm the park environment or to keep others from enjoying this wonderful resource. We also love and respect our nation's tradition of unrestricted free speech, and will take whatever action is necessary to protect this irreplaceable right. We strongly oppose any plan by the Parks Department which would establish a discriminatory condition for free expression, based on the ability to pay or offer the highest bid. We urge those who care about freedom of speech and the freedom to use public parks to join with us in protesting this unfair and completely unecessary policy. For more information contact:Robert Lederman, president of A.R.T.I.S.T. (Artists' Response To Illegal State Tactics) (718) 369-2111 e-mail ARTISTpres@aol.com A.R.T.I.S.T. Web Page: http://homepage.interaccess.com/~mar/nyc.html Thomas Rozinski, Legal Counsel Department of Parks (212) 360-1319 Metropolitan Museum of, Art press office (212) 570-3900 "This Time NY Parks Mean Business" 2/16/96 NY Times Metro section; NY Times Letters: "Keep Free Expression in Parks Free" 2/23/96; "Parks Restrict Sale of Art, Not It's Creation" 2/28/96; "New Allies For Street Artists", Art in America March 1996 pg. 128