Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1993 12:50:30 EDT From: Bruce Umbaugh Message-ID: <93231.125030BDU100F@ODUVM.BITNET> Newsgroups: comp.admin.policy,comp.org.eff.talk Subject: Re: A policy draft paraphrase In article <93230.215419BDU100F@ODUVM.BITNET>, Bruce Umbaugh says: > >In article , betsys@cs.umb.edu >(Elizabeth >Schwartz) says: >> >>In article <93229.140914BDU100F@ODUVM.BITNET> Bruce Umbaugh >> writes: >> >> "Time, place, and manner" restrictions on speech are quite >> common and are not Constitutionally forbidden infringements. As >>[snip] >> Do you have any pointers to this? > [snip] > One place to look for more would be the "Report from the >Committee on Freedom of Expression at Yale University," but I >haven't got a citation to a published version beyond that. If >nothing else turns up here soon, as I say, I'll search out more. > More: In "The Right of Students to Associate," (_Synthesis: Law and Policy in Higher Education_, vol. 3, no. 5, Winter 1991), Tom Scheurmann briefly discusses "regulation of speech based on content." He says: --colleges may regulate based on the type of forum (e.g., public, private, limited public) (Perry Educational Ass'n v. Perry Local Education Ass'n, 460 US 37 (1983) --"reasonable time, place and manner restrictions" such as opening a facility for use only at particular times or days of the week (U.S. v. Grace, 461 U.S. 171 (1983) --such limitations must be content-neutral and must use the least restrictive means available (McMullen v. Carson, 568 F. Supp. 937 (D. Fla. 983) Hope those help. For more, try the March, 1989 Synthesis, which concerned regulation of speech on campus. (I think I have it at home, but not at hand here.) -- Bruce Umbaugh bdu100f@oduvm.cc.odu.edu Dept. of Philosophy | Humanize the Internet: Ethernet Old Dominion University | the Arts faculty. Norfolk, Virginia 23529 USA | -- Peter Danielson